![multiletter mail merge on mac multiletter mail merge on mac](https://docplayer.net/docs-images/42/16348500/images/page_16.jpg)
- MULTILETTER MAIL MERGE ON MAC CODE
- MULTILETTER MAIL MERGE ON MAC FREE
- MULTILETTER MAIL MERGE ON MAC MAC
This arises in part because the new compaction code (# 9728) OCaml 4.12 onwards for traversing GC roots in static data ("caml_globals") is not correct if any of the roots areĬlosures. In Flambda 2 land we spent two person-days debugging a problem relating to Infix_tag! We discovered that the code in I fixed the random segfaults that were occurring on the RISC-V Inria CI worker There will be a design document for this coming in due I've also been involved in discussions about a newįunction-level attribute to cause an error if safe points (including allocations) might exist within a function'sīody, to make code that currently assumes this robust. Significantly simplified the proposed backend changes. I did a first pass of review on the safe points PR (# 10039) and
![multiletter mail merge on mac multiletter mail merge on mac](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/3aecLKbNR-8/maxresdefault.jpg)
It's a nontrivialĬhange involving a new static analysis and a number of tweaks in every code emitter, but things are starting to look It's a necessary step towards Multicore OCaml, so we really need to move forward on this one. (# 10039) and the changes on top of this proposed by Damien Doligez. A bit of scripting later (8b1bc01c3) and voilà, arm64-macosĬurrently, I'm reading the "safe points" proposal by Sadiq Jaffer Version of OCaml instead of the intended ARM64 version. Unknown reasons, Jenkins ran the CI script in x86-64 emulation mode, so we were building and testing an x86-64
MULTILETTER MAIL MERGE ON MAC MAC
I spent quality time with the Jenkins continuous integration system at Inria, integrating a new Mac Mini M1. Was duplicating platform-independent calculations (of which instructions are pure) in platform-dependent files. In passing, it refactors similar code that Parts of the back-end that some platform-specific instructions can raise. # 10354 fixes this by informing the platform-independent This was due to a ARM (32 and 64 bits)-specific optimization of array bound checking, which was not taken intoĪccount by the platform-independent parts of the back-end, leading to incorrect liveness analysis and wrong registerĪllocation. I fixed # 10339, a mysterious crash on the new Macs with "Apple silicon". Week Florian landed a nice PR fixing several distinct issues related to signature item grouping: Now we are looking are fixing other bugs with his code January 2021 and we merged it in April 2021.
![multiletter mail merge on mac multiletter mail merge on mac](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/dqe0rCRIyPk/maxresdefault.jpg)
Reviewing in May-September 2020 and we decided to do sizeable changes, he split it in several smaller changes in # 8929, to fix a bug in the reprinting of signatures. This is work that Florian started in September 2019 with Items are "ghost items" that are morally attached in a "main item" the code mostly ignores this and this creates I am working with (Florian Angeletti) on grouping signature items when traversing module signatures. We only warn on multi-letter sequences of unsigned specifiers. (Weįirst deprecated all unsigned specifiers, but Leo White tested the result and remarked that -w A is common, so now Now multi-letter sequences of "unsigned" specifiers ( -p is signed, a is unsigned) are deprecated. Interpreted as the sequence w -p -w a -w r -w t -w i -w a -w l, most of which are ignored but -w a silences all Before -w -partial-match disables warning 4, but -w -partial is I worked with Florian Angeletti on deprecating certain command-line warning-specifier sequences, to avoid usability
MULTILETTER MAIL MERGE ON MAC FREE
If you have been working on the OCaml compiler and want to say something, please feel free to post! If you would like me to get in touch next time I prepare a newsletter issue (some random point in the future), please let me know by email at (gabriel.scherer at gmail).Feel free of course to comment or ask questions, but I don't know if the people who wrote a small blurb will be looking at the thread, so no promises.Please don't expect that it will be as polished (This initiative is inspired by the excellent Multicore newsletter. Hopefully this can give a small window on development activity related to the OCaml compiler, structured differentlyįrom the endless stream of Pull Requests on the compiler codebase. This is by no means exhaustive: many people didn't end up having the time to write something, and it's fine. Sharing more information on what people are interested in, looking at and working on. To the OCaml compiler codebase to write a small burb on what they have been doing recently, in the interest of I'm happy to introduce the first issue of the "OCaml compiler development newsletter".